Posts Tagged ‘Silicon Valley’

NASA Base is Most Sustainable Federal Building Project in America

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Sustainable Building, NASA, Sustainability Base, WM+P, Green Building, William McDonough + Partners

NASA has planted its flag on planet Earth (for a change) with the groundbreaking of their “Sustainability Base” this week. The new endeavor is located on their Ames campus in Moffett Field, CA just outside of Silicon Valley and has specs that are pushing green building to new limits. In order to deliver in true sustainable style, NASA recruited Inhabitat favorite, William McDonough + Partners, to take on the 50,000-square foot collaborative support facility.






Read the rest of NASA Base is Most Sustainable Federal Building Project in America



Permalink |
Add to
del.icio.us |
digg


Post tags: , , , , ,

Battery Startup Seeo Raises $8.6M, With Khosla Back for More

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Vinod Khosla, one of Silicon Valley’s biggest cleantech backers and the founder of Sun Microsystems, may be keeping an eye on the hype about lithium-ion batteries, but the venture capitalist is still excited about one of his earlier lithium battery plays: Seeo. The stealthy startup, which is developing a nano-structured lithium-polymer battery, has raised more than .6 million in new funding, according to regulatory filings picked up by peHUB this morning, and investors in the round include Khosla’s firm, Khosla Ventures.

Seeo, based in Berkeley, Calif., has now raised a total of more than .6 million for its solid-state battery, which is based on a solid polymer electrolyte that the founders developed at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. The material, which Seeo began licensing from the lab in 2007, allows for a more stable battery with higher energy density and none of the flammable liquid electrolytes that present a safety risk in conventional lithium-ion batteries.

According to founder and technology director Mohit Singh, the company’s batteries can operate at a much higher temperature than competing devices, which means it can be used in rugged, outdoor applications — attached to a solar system, for example. The Berkeley Lab also anticipates applications for technology like Seeo’s in electric vehicles, and says the startup’s batteries are on track to achieve the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium’s 5,000-cycle goal for plug-in vehicle batteries.

Seeo remains very tight-lipped about its technology, strategy and commercialization plans. But when I spoke with some of the startup’s team this week at IBM’s Almaden Institute, they shared Khosla’s take that lithium-ion batteries don’t represent a silver bullet for all energy storage challenges. And materials development director Hany Eitouni said he agreed with Ford’s Ted Miller, who spoke at the event and showed a slide depicting “evolution” of lithium-ion batteries through around 2017 — and then a “revolutionary technology change” after that. Will we really see such a shift in that time frame? We’ll have to, Eitouni said.

In the meantime, the company (and Khosla, through his investments) is jockeying to snag a piece of an increasingly competitive and growing market. Despite the hype, Khosla has said, “Lithium-ion markets are here today. We’re investing because there are good markets.”



Will Google Wave be the end of email as we know it? Find out at NewNet on GigaOM Pro.

Why IBM’s Betting on Lithium Air Batteries: Nanotech and Supercomputers

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Usually when IBM catches our eye with a cleantech play these days, it’s related to the smart grid: Big Blue has developed a variety of software to give utilities more intelligence on the power grid, and the computing giant’s Energy & Utilities chief, Guido Bartels, ranks among our top 15 smart grid influencers.

But in June IBM launched an ambitious battery project with several partners (including national labs), with a goal to commercialize an experimental battery technology — lithium metal-air — and to achieve at least 10 times the energy density of today’s batteries. And this week, the company is hosting a gathering of some of the world’s top battery researchers, auto companies and others involved with batteries for electric cars, to talk about moving beyond lithium-ion, the battery technology of choice for mass market electric cars now in the pipeline at companies including Nissan, General Motors and Tesla Motors.

So what’s IBM doing with lithium air — a risky technology that uses “highly flammable lithium metal to react with oxygen in the air,” as Technology Review explained recently. According to Winfried Wilcke, Senior Manager of Nanoscale Science & Technology, and Program Director of Silicon Valley Projects for IBM’s Almaden Research Center, the project plugs into IBM’s expertise in two main areas: nanotechnology and supercomputers.

Lithium-air batteries will require “really sophisticated nanostructures” in order to keep water out and let oxygen in, says Wilcke. IBM has been working on its nanotech research for years, particularly in micro electronic mechanical systems. One of the keys to cracking the lithium-air battery code could also be supercomputers said Wilcke (they’ll be used to model potential catalysts) — also one of IBM’s specialties.

Even with IBM’s work, the battery technology is still a long shot. According to Dalhousie University’s Jeff Dahn, who spoke today at Almaden, “rechargeable lithium air…will be very very challenging. I wouldn’t bet the farm on this, but it has to be explored.”

IBM now has a team of 6-10 people working on the project, and it’s growing. Wicke said he expects the basic science questions to be answered within three years, at a cost of tens of millions of dollars (for all the partners combined — IBM’s own financial contribution remains “in flux”).

Why lithium air? “It’s the only system that has a chance to be as good as gasoline” and make a significant dent in transportation fuel, according to Wilcke. But it’s far from proven, and “lithium ion is not going to go away anytime soon,” he said. “There could be big boulders and pebbles flying in our face, but we see a path.”



How will real-time change the enterprise? Find out at NewNet, GigaOM Pro’s newest research topic area.

Tesla Founder Marc Tarpenning on How to Start a Car Company

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Compared with Tesla Motors co-founder Martin Eberhard, the startup’s other founder — Marc Tarpenning — has kept a relatively low profile. But Tarpenning spoke this morning at IBM’s Almaden Institute 2009 in San Jose, Calif., telling his version of the Tesla creation story that Eberhard and CEO Elon Musk have been fighting over this summer.

Back in 2003, Tarpenning and Eberhard knew they wanted to start a new company, but hadn’t settled on specifics. “We knew we wanted to solve a real problem,” Tarpenning said. “We just couldn’t do another network widget.” Eberhard suggested that they “do oil.” Climate change had yet to become a major mainstream concern in the U.S., but “there was this nagging suspicion about, what if we run out of this stuff.”

The pair looked at cellulosic ethanol and hydrogen fuel cells, but ultimately decided to work on the electric car. Tarpenning said that at the time, about half of the venture capital community was interested in taking a close look at fuel cells, and the other half had already looked at the technology and concluded that “the energy equation doesn’t make sense.”

Settling on electric vehicles, Tarpenning and Eberhard developed the idea of building a beautiful, but expensive “aspirational” vehicle to help improve the image of green cars and bring them into the mainstream. Then the entrepreneurship part began. “Imagination is great,” but “how do you then start a car company?” Tarpenning said. “In Silicon Valley, you have an idea, you immediately incorporate — why not?”

From there, Tarpenning described Tesla’s next three years as a cycle of developing, hitting a milestone, and then seeking fresh capital. When you have a major milestone, you switch gears, said Tarpenning, to seek funds for future development. After hitting its first major milestone in 2004 — the company’s first drivable version of a Tesla car — “the main thing we did is immediately raise money,” he said.

By May 2006, when Tesla had closed its third round of venture capital investment, Tarpenning said the pitch had gotten much easier — and not just because the startup had a drivable mule. The cleantech sector had started to take off and the startup refined its pitch, shifting from the idea of a car with “a bunch of computers in it and it goes real fast,” to a technology and vehicle that could become a key part of the nascent cleantech sector and market for greener cars.

Even so, Tesla ran into trouble late the following year when the transmission failed in durability testing, and in April 2008 had to get a bridge loan. This time, the milestone-fundraise pattern worked against the startup. “We had this big milestone, and we failed it.” These were “dark times” for Tesla, Tarpenning said.

Tesla has since managed to pull itself away from the brink, and Tarpenning noted, has since “received a bunch of money” from the Department of Energy loan program, as well as a million investment from Daimler AG.

But Tesla is far from mass production. And Tarpenning says he’s “a little skeptical” that Tesla will hit its 2011 production target for its own electric sedan. Likewise EVs are nowhere close to mainstream. What’s the biggest hurdle still standing between electric cars and the mass market, according to Tarpenning? “The batteries really aren’t good enough yet.”



On Sept 10th, 500 people will gather to figure out how to make the most of the billion mobile web market at Mobilize 09. Join them!